As a member of the Military Nationwide Guard in 2019 and 2020, Jefferson Griffin voted in North Carolina elections utilizing army absentee ballots.
Now, as he seeks to overturn the outcomes of a state Supreme Courtroom election that went in opposition to him, Griffin is asking that very same courtroom to disqualify the votes of round 5,500 individuals who voted in the identical method as he had.
Since Democrat Allison Riggs gained reelection to the state’s highest courtroom final 12 months by 734 votes, Griffin, now a Republican decide on the state’s Courtroom of Appeals, has repeatedly tried to nullify her victory. Final week, the Republican majority on the state Supreme Courtroom temporarily blocked the certification of Riggs’ win after Griffin filed a authorized petition arguing that the election must be awarded to him.
In a briefing, Griffin’s legal professionals argued that ballots solid by abroad and army voters shouldn’t be counted if they didn’t additionally present photograph identification, equivalent to a photocopy of a driver’s license. His place contradicts that of the state election board, which had issued a rule earlier than the election stating that such voters didn’t have to offer an ID.
Griffin’s use of those army ballots, which ProPublica confirmed utilizing publicly accessible voting knowledge and paperwork obtained through an open data request, has not been beforehand reported.
Two of Griffin’s absentee poll requests got here whereas he was deployed as a captain and a judge advocate general within the North Carolina Military Nationwide Guard. They have been coated by a federal regulation known as the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, extra generally generally known as UOCAVA.
Good journalism makes a distinction:
Our nonprofit, unbiased newsroom has one job: to carry the highly effective to account. Right here’s how our investigations are spurring real world change:
We’re making an attempt one thing new. Was it helpful?
In August 2019, for a municipal election, Griffin requested an absentee ballot, checking a field testifying that he was a “Member of the Uniformed Providers or Service provider Marine on energetic obligation and presently absent from county of residence.” Griffin listed his tackle as Fort Bliss, Texas, and the North Carolina Military Nationwide Guard’s 30th Armored Brigade Combat Team.
In January 2020, Griffin made a similar absentee ballot request for the March 2020 major election, once more checking a field that he was “on energetic obligation within the Uniformed Providers.”
At the moment, North Carolina did not have a law in force requiring photo ID to be offered for in-person or absentee voters. (Although handed in 2018, the regulation didn’t take impact till late 2023.)
ProPublica despatched Griffin a listing of detailed questions, to which he replied: “I’m not allowed to touch upon pending litigation. It could be a violation of our NC Code of Judicial Conduct for me to take action.”
Embry Owen, the marketing campaign supervisor for Riggs, criticized Griffin’s stance within the litigation. “Energetic-duty members of the army who’re serving our nation abroad rely on their rights underneath UOCAVA to vote and make their voice heard. The identical is true for members of the overseas service and missionaries within the subject,” Owen stated. “Any try to silence these voters is a disgrace on North Carolina’s democracy.”
As a part of his authorized combat, Griffin is difficult a number of classes of ballots, together with over 60,000 which can be lacking driver’s license or Social Safety knowledge. However his idea that such data is critical to legally vote has been repeatedly dismissed by the state election board, a federal decide appointed by President Donald Trump and even a right-wing activist who initially pushed it. In a digital assembly, the activist known as it “voter suppression” and stated he was “100%” sure it might fail in courtroom, as ProPublica has reported.
Nevertheless, the difficulty of the 5,500 UOCAVA ballots has grow to be more and more necessary as a result of Griffin has prioritized them in his newest authorized briefing, asking the state Supreme Courtroom to contemplate them first and, if nullifying these votes proves determinative, hand the election to him.
“Within the Supreme Courtroom contest, 5,509 such ballots have been unlawfully solid,” Griffin’s legal professionals wrote in their brief. “Choose Griffin anticipates that, if these illegal ballots are excluded, he’ll win the election.”
Griffin is barely making an attempt to disqualify UOCAVA ballots in closely Democratic counties, ignoring ballots from Republican areas, a ProPublica evaluation of the contested ballots discovered. A knowledge evaluation by unbiased journalist Bryan Anderson discovered that Democratic ballots were disproportionately targeted, with Democrats being nearly 5 occasions as doubtless as Republicans to have their ballots questioned by Griffin, although there are roughly equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans in North Carolina.
“Choose Griffin’s focusing on of army and abroad voters from 4 closely Democratic counties lays plain his objective: toss votes to retroactively win an election he already misplaced,” Owen stated.
Griffin’s legal professionals have argued to the state Supreme Courtroom that since North Carolina regulation requires in-person voters to indicate a photograph ID, UOCAVA voters ought to need to as properly, equivalent to by offering an image of their driver’s license.
Nevertheless, the state board of elections has repeatedly dominated that UOCAVA voters will not be required to take action. When placing down Griffin’s challenges to the election leads to December, the bipartisan panel unanimously rejected Griffin’s assertion that UOCAVA ballots submitted with out photograph IDs have been illegal, although it cut up alongside partisan traces for different challenges he made.
“We aren’t at liberty to alter the election guidelines as they’re established,” stated Stacy Eggers IV, a Republican member of the board, when voting to reject Griffin’s challenges. “Now we have beforehand adopted a rule that claims army and abroad voters will not be required to indicate a voter ID” and “until a courtroom says in any other case, I’d discover that we’re certain by that rule.”
Griffin has gone to extraordinary lengths to have this matter heard by the state Supreme Courtroom, which has a Republican majority, submitting his petition on to the excessive courtroom as an alternative of working by decrease courts first, as is the usual course of specified by state regulation. ProPublica has reported that the courtroom’s Republican chief justice, Paul Newby, has been described by Griffin as a “good friend and mentor,” and many of the spouses of the Republican justices have donated to Griffin’s most up-to-date or earlier campaigns.
UOCAVA ballots are the first methodology of voting for American service members stationed away from house and for different People dwelling abroad. Voters request an absentee ballot by submitting the Federal Post Card Application to their election workplace, after which it checks their eligibility and offers them the poll, which the voter then mails in both electronically or bodily. Round 2.8 million Americans eligible to vote live overseas, and tens of hundreds of them vote utilizing this methodology, together with hundreds of North Carolinians.
Whether or not these ballots will rely within the Griffin-Riggs race is presently being thought-about in parallel authorized proceedings on the North Carolina Supreme Courtroom and 4th U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals. The state board and Riggs’ marketing campaign have argued that the matter must be determined in federal courtroom, as the difficulty pertains to federal regulation. Briefings and oral arguments are scheduled in each by the rest of the month. Till the election is set in courtroom, Riggs will proceed to carry her seat. It’s the final unresolved election within the nation from 2024.
Claude Murray, a member of Frequent Protection, a veterans group that has had the ballots of a few of its North Carolina members challenged, criticized Griffin’s actions. “The appropriate to vote is one thing People typically take with no consideration, however as veterans we all know how treasured it actually is. Choose Griffin is aware of this too and is selecting a distinct path,” Murray stated. “It’s shameful that he’s now in search of to invalidate hundreds of votes — together with army members and their households — just because he misplaced an election.”
A voting rights advocate has compiled a listing of challenged ballots on this race; you’ll be able to verify whether or not your vote is amongst them here. Whether it is, reporter Doug Bock Clark is curious about listening to your story. Electronic mail him at [email protected] and briefly describe your expertise and why you consider you have been challenged. Additionally, please attain out when you have any details about the North Carolina Supreme Courtroom or state courtroom system that you just suppose we should always know. Clark could be reached securely through telephone or on Sign at 678-243-0784. If you happen to’re involved about confidentiality, check out our advice on the most secure ways to share tips.